LITERATURE ANALYSIS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AUDITOR COMPETENCE AND AUDIT QUALITY

Authors

  • Lianti Polapa Universitas Gorontalo
  • Nikma Bilondatu Akuntansi. Universitas Gorontalo
  • Mohamad Abdul Radjak Masjhur Akuntansi. Universitas Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61912/jeinsa.v4i2.374

Keywords:

Auditor Competence, Audit Quality, Systematic Literature Review, Auditor Independence, Audit Profession

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to identify research trends, methodological approaches, and patterns of empirical findings regarding the relationship between auditor competence and audit quality. The study follows the PRISMA guidelines in the processes of identification, selection, and synthesis of the literature. The literature search was carried out through the Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases, covering publications from 2020 to 2025. Articles were selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 35 studies being analyzed using thematic analysis and narrative synthesis approaches. The results of the review indicate that auditor competence generally has a positive effect on audit quality, particularly through aspects of professional knowledge, audit experience, and auditors’ technical skills. The literature also shows that this relationship is often influenced by other factors such as auditor independence, professional skepticism, and time pressure in audit execution. In addition, most studies employ a quantitative survey-based approach, while qualitative studies remain relatively limited. This review also identifies variations in findings influenced by differences in research contexts and variable measurement methods. Overall, this SLR provides a comprehensive synthesis of the relationship between auditor competence and audit quality and highlights the importance of developing auditors’ professional competence to improve audit quality. These findings have implications for future research, audit practice, and policy development in enhancing professional auditing standards.

References

Gunawan, D. (2024). Auditor competence and independence on audit quality. Accounting Analysis Journal, 13(2), 110–120.

Insanuadi, M., & Muhyarsyah. (2025). The effect of auditor competence, independence, and integrity on audit quality. Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 13(1), 52–63.

Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., & Budgen, D. (2020). The value of mapping studies – A participant-observer case study. Empirical Software Engineering, 25(6), 4783–4808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09852-5

Lonto, M., et al. (2025). Information technology usage, auditor competence, and internal audit effectiveness. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia.

Nguyen, T. D., et al. (2024). Internal audit effectiveness and organizational factors in emerging markets. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).

Nguyen, T. D., et al. (2025). Organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness in emerging markets. Cogent Business & Management.

Novatiani, R. A., et al. (2024). Internal auditor competence and internal control in preventing fraudulent financial reporting. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).

Novatiani, R. A., et al. (2024). Internal auditor competence and internal control in preventing fraudulent financial reporting. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).

Nugroho, V. (2023). Auditor competency and its impact on audit quality. Binabangsa International Journal of Business and Management, 3(1), 45–55.

Nugroho, V. (2025). The effect of auditor competency, experience, and ethics on audit quality. Binabangsa International Journal of Business and Management.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Putri, N. A., & Hartono, S. (2023). Determinants of dysfunctional auditor behavior: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Ar Ro’is Mandalika, 3(2), 100–112.

Raihan, A. D. (2024). Competence, professional skepticism, workload, and time pressure on audit quality. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 12(2), 88–101.

Raihan, A. D. (2025). Competence, professional skepticism, workload, and time pressure on audit quality. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Syalwa, M., et al. (2024). Input indicators of audit quality based on IAASB framework. Journal of Accounting Research, 8(1), 15–27.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.

Zaqiani, S. P. (2025). The role of auditor competence and independence in internal audit quality. International Journal of Innovative Science and Engineering.

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Polapa, L., Bilondatu, N. ., & Radjak Masjhur, M. A. . (2025). LITERATURE ANALYSIS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AUDITOR COMPETENCE AND AUDIT QUALITY. Jurnal Ekonomi Ichsan Sidenreng Rappang, 4(2), 739–748. https://doi.org/10.61912/jeinsa.v4i2.374

Issue

Section

Articles